The Time Change (Zeitumstellung 2025) Is Back: Why Millions Still Say No to Daylight Saving Time

Subscribe to Notifications

Zeitumstellung 2025: The countdown clock is ticking down to the most debated biannual event in Europe: the end of Daylight Saving Time (DST). On Sunday, October 26, 2025, the clocks across Germany and much of the continent will be switched back an hour, officially transitioning to Central European Standard Time (CET)—colloquially known as winter time. The shift takes place in the dead of night: at 3:00 a.m. local time, clocks will be reset to 2:00 a.m. This effectively grants a theoretical extra hour of sleep but simultaneously signals an earlier arrival for evening darkness.

The changeover isn’t a modern fluke; the twice-yearly change has been a feature in Germany for over 40 years, since its reintroduction in the summer of 1980. Its underlying premise was straightforward: to make more efficient use of daylight hours and, critically, save energy following the oil crisis. This year’s clock change is expected to be as disruptive and divisive as ever, serving as a powerful annual reminder of a practice that the public overwhelmingly wishes to see abolished.

The Myth of Energy Savings: Why the Original Purpose Failed

The initial rationale for introducing Daylight Saving Time was to conserve energy by reducing the need for artificial lighting during the extended evening hours of summer. However, multiple studies have rendered this original goal all but obsolete, transforming the practice into what many consider an unnecessary logistical and health burden.

The official analysis paints a disappointing picture:

• Minimal European Savings: A 2016 analysis of several European studies by the Office for Technology Assessment at the German Bundestag (TAB) found that DST led to a maximum electricity consumption reduction of only one percent across the continent.
• Negligible National Impact: Model calculations by the TAB suggested the reduction in total electricity consumption for Germany was an even smaller 0.2 percent.
• The Offset Effect: Any savings gained from lower lighting consumption in the evening are often nullified by an increased demand for heating or air conditioning during the newly adjusted, cooler morning or evening hours in spring and autumn.

Zeitumstellung 2025: Researchers from the Ostwestfalen-Lippe University of Applied Sciences and the University of Kassel found only slightly higher results, estimating a total energy saving of just under 0.8 percent across Germany. For a majority of the population, the minimal economic benefit simply doesn’t justify the personal cost.

The Human Cost: Public Discontent and Health Consequences

The overwhelming opposition to the time change (Zeitumstellung 2025) stems from its tangible impact on health and daily life. The disruption caused by the seasonal shift is not merely psychological; it is a measurable biological stressor.

A recent Forsa survey conducted for the DAK health insurance company revealed deep-seated resentment toward the practice:

Survey Finding	Percentage
Respondents who view the clock change as unnecessary (Nationwide)	76%
Strongest Opposition (Eastern Germany)	82%
Opposition in Baden-Württemberg	78%
Respondents who have experienced problems after the change	31%

The Body’s Battle with the Clock

Manuel Spitschan, a researcher specializing in the effects of light on human health at the Max Planck Institute in Tübingen, highlights the scientific basis for the public’s malaise. He notes that the abrupt change throws the circadian rhythm—the body’s internal, molecular clock—into disarray.

Also Read: FEHB Changes: Your 2026 Health Coverage Action Plan (1000+ words)

“The internal clock in the brain is the conductor for the orchestra of cells,” Spitschan explains. When this rhythm is missing or shifted, the cells become disorganized. While the switch to winter time is generally considered easier than the “lost hour” of spring, as the body technically “gains” an hour, the transition still forces a quick, uncomfortable adjustment.

Reported problems resulting from this misalignment are widespread:

1. Extreme Fatigue and Lethargy: Reported by 75% of those experiencing issues.
2. Sleep Disturbances: A key problem for 65% of those affected.
3. Impaired Cognitive Function: Nearly 40% struggle with difficulty concentrating.
4. Mood Shifts: 34% report increasing irritability.

Furthermore, these issues are disproportionately felt by women, with 39 percent reporting problems compared to 24 percent of men. The disruption is also noted in the agricultural sector, where animals, including pets and livestock like cows, suffer altered feeding and milking routines.

The Political Limbo: The EU’s Stalled Abolition Plan

Despite the clear medical evidence and overwhelming public rejection, the annual time change (Zeitumstellung) persists because of political gridlock at the European Union level.

• The 2019 Vote: In 2019, the European Parliament approved the European Commission’s proposal to end DST starting in 2021.
• The Stalemate: Since that vote, however, nothing has happened. The plan remains stalled because EU member states have been unable to reach a consensus on one crucial decision: whether to adopt permanent Summer Time or permanent Standard (Winter) Time.
• The Delay: Without a unified regulation, the plan is to maintain the current clock-change system until at least the end of 2026.

The consequence of this political inaction is the perpetuation of semi-annual chaos, which extends beyond individual health and energy concerns. It also impacts the wider economy, causing problems in the transport and logistics sector (requiring timetable adjustments), and introducing short-term fluctuations in global financial markets when countries change their clocks non-synchronously. Countries like Russia, China, Brazil, and several in Central Africa, having already abandoned the practice, demonstrate that an alternative is viable.

Synchronizing Your Life: Expert Tips for a Smoother Transition

As the political debate continues, individuals can take proactive steps to minimize the disruption caused by the upcoming shift. Experts emphasize that the key to a smoother transition lies in strategically managing light exposure, the body’s most potent external signal for setting its internal clock.

Manuel Spitschan advises:

• Embrace Morning Light: Exposure to light in the morning hours helps set the body clock forward, aiding in a fresher start to the day.
• Minimize Evening Light: To facilitate a good night’s sleep, people should aim to avoid very bright light, especially in the three hours leading up to bedtime.
• Maintain Routine: Environmental stimuli and personal habits are also important synchronization signals. Late meals or intensive exercise can shift the internal clock, suggesting that maintaining consistent eating and exercise routines can help stabilize the body’s rhythm during the change.

Aligning the Soul’s Clock: A Spiritual Perspective on Time

The enlightened Sant Rampal Ji Maharaj offers a profound wisdom that shifts focus from fleeting mechanical time to the timeless nature of the soul. He guides his followers to measure their progress not by the clock, but through the teachings of holy scriptures. Sant Rampal Ji Maharaj’s instructions act as a spiritual clock, helping devotees align their lives with divine principles to attain true pleasures and salvation, enabling them to easily navigate the disruptions caused by temporary earthly time changes.

The Mandate for Permanent Time

The clock change on October 26, 2025, underscores the persistent conflict between a contested 40-year-old practice and modern health, science, and public opinion. The core mandate is clear: energy savings are negligible, health disruptions—ranging from fatigue to irritability—are significant, and the vast majority of citizens (76% in Germany) deem the ritual unnecessary.

Despite a 2019 vote by the European Parliament to abolish the practice, political inertia over selecting a permanent time has indefinitely extended the annual turmoil. Until EU member states can resolve their disagreement, the twice-yearly switch will remain a source of collective exhaustion and frustration.

FAQs on Europe’s Daylight Saving Time Change

Subscribe to Notifications