The controversy surrounding the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) examination process has entered a significant legal phase after educator and YouTuber Nitish Rajput faced a ₹2.5 crore defamation lawsuit filed by Eduquity Technologies Pvt. Ltd. The dispute emerged following Rajput’s investigative video titled “Reality of SSC Exams,” in which he questioned the transparency of SSC’s tendering and vendor selection processes using Right to Information (RTI) replies and official documents.
As the case continues in a Delhi court, the issue has evolved beyond a legal dispute into a wider national debate involving examination integrity, recruitment transparency, digital accountability, and the concerns of millions of government job aspirants across India.
Key Highlights of the Nitish Rajput SSC Controversy and Defamation Case
- Eduquity Technologies Pvt. Ltd. filed a ₹2.5 crore defamation suit against YouTuber and educator Nitish Rajput in a Delhi court.
- The case followed Rajput’s investigative video “Reality of SSC Exams,” released in September 2025.
- The video examined SSC’s tendering process, vendor selection, and operational rule changes using RTI replies and public records.
- Rajput alleged that modifications in tender rules and eligibility norms may have affected examination integrity.
- The controversy gained traction during SSC Phase-13 and CGL 2024–2025 exam cycles amid candidate complaints.
- Reported issues included server crashes, biometric mismatches, delayed schedules, and logistical failures at examination centres.
- Eduquity rejected the allegations, calling them misleading and damaging to its reputation.
- The company sought financial compensation and removal of the video.
- Rajput refused to remove the content, maintaining that it is based on verified public records and public-interest analysis.
- Student groups and aspirant organizations have sought wider judicial intervention, with discussions around approaching the Supreme Court.
- The issue has intensified debates around transparency, recruitment reforms, and accountability in competitive examinations.
How the Controversy Began: The “Reality of SSC Exams” Video
The dispute traces back to September 2025 when Nitish Rajput released an investigative video analysing the functioning of SSC examinations. In the video, Rajput relied on RTI responses, official tender documents, and publicly available records to question the transparency of the SSC’s tendering system and vendor appointment procedures.
He highlighted the transition of examination vendors, including the shift from Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) to Eduquity Technologies, and alleged that changes in tender rules and eligibility criteria may have favored certain private players. According to his analysis, frequent policy changes and operational decisions raised concerns about the technical integrity and fairness of large-scale recruitment examinations conducted nationwide.
The video quickly gained attention among government job aspirants and became widely circulated across social media platforms.
Examination Complaints and Aspirant Concerns Gain Momentum
The controversy intensified during the SSC Phase-13 and Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2024–2025 examination cycles, when many candidates reported technical and logistical difficulties. Aspirants cited server crashes during active exam sessions, biometric mismatches at entry points, delayed schedules, and poorly managed examination centres.
Student groups organized protests in Delhi demanding improvements in exam management and calling for more reliable systems. Rajput’s video became a focal point for these grievances, bringing long-standing concerns into the national spotlight and amplifying calls for accountability within the recruitment framework.
Supporters argued that the controversy reflected systemic challenges rather than an isolated dispute between a content creator and an examination vendor.
Eduquity Technologies’ Response and Legal Action
Eduquity Technologies Pvt. Ltd., which conducts several SSC examinations, rejected the allegations made in the video and stated that the claims were inaccurate and harmful to its professional reputation. The company subsequently filed a defamation suit seeking ₹2.5 crore in damages and requested the removal of the video from public platforms.
According to the company’s position, the content caused reputational and business harm. The matter is currently pending before a Delhi trial court, with hearings ongoing and no final verdict delivered so far.
The legal proceedings have shifted the controversy from social media discussions and protests into the judicial arena.
Nitish Rajput’s Stand and Public Interest Argument
Nitish Rajput has refused to take down the video, stating that his analysis is based on verified public documents and reflects concerns consistently raised by SSC aspirants. He maintains that the video falls within responsible public-interest commentary and fact-based analysis.
His stance has received support from sections of the aspirant community, many of whom view the issue as part of a larger demand for transparency and fairness in government recruitment examinations. The case has also sparked broader discussions about the risks faced by digital educators, investigative content creators, and online commentators when raising questions using publicly available information.
Who Is Nitish Rajput? Background and Public Profile
Nitish Rajput was born on October 4, 1989, in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, and spent part of his early childhood in Rudrapur before his family later moved to Delhi. After completing his Class 12 education, he pursued a B.Tech in Information Technology from Gautam Buddha University in Uttar Pradesh.
He worked in a corporate role for about a year before leaving the profession during the pandemic to focus on YouTube, motivated by what he has described as a commitment to honest and fact-driven analysis. While no official figures are publicly confirmed, estimates suggest his net worth ranges between ₹86.79 crore and ₹127.92 crore, with YouTube earnings forming a major part of his income. In a separate development last year, Rajput stated on social media that his YouTube channel had been blocked in Pakistan, sharing what he described as an official notification from the platform.
Growing Calls for Judicial Review and Possible Supreme Court Intervention
As the case continues, student groups and aspirant organizations have intensified demands for judicial oversight of SSC’s recruitment framework. Several associations are reportedly considering petitions seeking Supreme Court intervention to ensure transparency in vendor selection, examination management, and accountability mechanisms.
The renewed focus comes at a time when recruitment processes across India are facing increased scrutiny. In previous cases involving examination and recruitment irregularities, the Supreme Court has intervened, encouraging aspirants to hope for similar judicial attention in this matter.
Legal observers suggest that the outcome of the case may have wider implications for whistleblowers, digital journalism, and the boundaries of defamation law in cases involving investigative reporting based on public records.
Spiritual Perspective: Understanding Truth Through the Unique Knowledge of Saint Rampal Ji Maharaj
Beyond legal debates and institutional discussions, many people also view issues of transparency, truth, and justice from a spiritual perspective. The teachings of Saint Rampal Ji Maharaj emphasize that honesty, accountability, and righteous conduct form the foundation of a just society. According to his spiritual knowledge, social systems function fairly only when individuals act with truthfulness and moral responsibility, free from personal bias or self-interest.
His teachings encourage seekers to pursue truth through awareness, ethical action, and spiritual understanding, suggesting that lasting reform in society begins with inner transformation and adherence to true spiritual knowledge.
A Defining Moment in the Debate Over Transparency in Competitive Examinations
The Nitish Rajput–SSC controversy has developed into more than a courtroom dispute. For millions of government job aspirants, it represents ongoing concerns about fairness, efficiency, and trust in India’s competitive examination system. As hearings continue in the Delhi court, the case remains closely watched by students, legal experts, and policymakers.
Its eventual outcome could influence future discussions on recruitment reforms, transparency in vendor appointments, accountability in examination management, and the role of independent digital voices in shaping public discourse around systems that directly affect the aspirations of lakhs of candidates across the country.
FAQs on Nitish Rajput SSC Controversy
1. Why was a ₹2.5 crore defamation case filed against Nitish Rajput?
Eduquity Technologies filed the case alleging Rajput’s SSC exam video contained misleading claims that damaged its reputation and business interests.
2. What did Nitish Rajput allege in his SSC video?
Rajput questioned SSC’s tendering and vendor selection process, citing RTI replies and documents, and raised concerns about rule changes and operational issues affecting exam integrity.
3. Is the Nitish Rajput SSC case still ongoing?
Yes, the defamation case is currently pending in a Delhi court, with hearings continuing and no final judgment announced so far.
4. Why are SSC aspirants supporting Nitish Rajput?
Many aspirants relate to issues highlighted in the video, including technical glitches, delays, and logistical problems reported during SSC examinations.
5. Is there any demand for Supreme Court intervention in the SSC controversy?
Student groups and aspirant organizations are reportedly considering petitions seeking Supreme Court intervention for an independent review of SSC exam management and vendor selection processes.
